Oxnard CA

Redflex, Canton Ohio, and Red Light Camera Studies

Red light camera studies abound.  In the final informational meeting for Canton Ohio’s proposed red light and speed camera ticketing system, Aaron Rosenberg, the Redflex Executive Vice President brought his “A” game.  This presentation was much more involved, cited more statistics and studies, and was thoroughly debunkable.

In starting the meeting, he gave a backhanded compliment to me.  He gestured towards me mentioning that “I have my figures and this gentleman has his…” in regards to whether or not accidents are reduced at intersections with ticketing cameras.

But what is the truth?  The Truth About Cars has a nice article about how gaping chasms of lies, half-truths, and skewed results seem to be in every study commissioned by those with a financial stake in these cameras.  The Newspaper, whose excellent English coverage of all things traffic camera related is a godsend, has a handy roundup .  Plenty of quotable quotes in there, including a couple of studies from researchers in Australia its self, where Redflex is based.
During the last meeting Rosenberg quoted a North Carolina study, attributing it to “a college” and he continued that “you know they are impartial because they have no financial stake in the red light cameras.”  This study may or may not be it.

He also referenced the Oxnard, CA study saying that “Fully 80% of residents were pleased with the Red Light Camera Systems and their performance.  They called and interviewed 1006 people.  I don’t know the population of Oxnard, CA, but I do know that this study has been used for years to sell cities on installing Redflex’s systems.  One fairly glaring problem:  The study is complete hogwash.  Actual independent analysis concluded that:  “The Oxnard red light camera study violates many basic principles of sound statistical public health research and lacks internal and external validity,”  Florida researchers concluded. “All red light camera investigations should be scrutinized for adherence to applied research methods since studies with greater adherence to quasi-experimental research designs have concluded red light cameras are associated with large increases in crashes and since special interest groups with a financial stake in red light camera use are actively working to influence public opinion and policy.” (quoted from The Newspaper article linked from “Oxnard, CA” above).  Which means they paid for the studies, and got the results they were asking for.

Anyway, also read this admonishion from Topix user quarterwave details the plethora of problems that Chillicothe is having with Redflex and their crooked cameras.

Quite damning, isn’t it?

An increase in crashes means an increase in injuries, something that Redflex and the cities partnered with them want you to ignore.  This blatant disregard for citizens’ and visiting motorists’ safety is disgusting.  All the cities with these crash inducing systems are exposing themselves to ENORMOUS liability.  There will be lawsuits when people get spinal or whiplash injuries, especially those that can barely be treated, or leave them paralyzed for life.

Well, we’ve only started our journey into the dark and devious world where Redflex stalks every driver, tickets many of them maliciously and erroneously, and steals as much as it can grab.  Follow me down the rabbit hole, and let’s expose these villains for what they are.   See you next crime.

-Nicholas Cincinat

Cold and fuming, Navarre – Feb 11th, 2009

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009 Automobilia, Politico, Red Light Cameras No Comments